Filtering images with MPSGraph FFT operations

At a glance

Project structure

Source bundle/
├── MPSGraphFFTSample/
│   └── MPSGraphFFTSample.swift
├── Configuration/
│   └── SampleCode.xcconfig
└── MPSGraphFFTSample.xcodeproj/
    ├── .xcodesamplecode.plist
    └── project.pbxproj

Structure observations

• Architecturally prominent files are ranked from entry points and role-named declarations; resource-only paths are omitted.
• Primary languages: Swift.
• The verified tree contains 3 project/configuration file(s) and 5 source declaration(s).

Overall architecture

flowchart LR
    N1["MPSGraphFFTSample"]
    N2["ContentView"]
    N3["MetalPerformanceShadersGraph APIs"]
    N1 --> N2
    N2 --> N3

Reference code

MPSGraphFFTSample/MPSGraphFFTSample.swift:279 — architecture anchor

@main
struct MPSGraphFFTSampleApp: App {
    var body: some Scene {
        WindowGroup {
            ContentView()
        }
    }
}

Interpretation

The arrows summarize the source-visible entry, role-named types or folders, and framework direction; when nodes come from structural folders, the sequence is a high-level interpretation rather than proof that every adjacent node calls the next. Ownership is claimed only where the next section cites a stored property or assignment. The diagram is intentionally limited to the dominant path into Metal Performance Shaders Graph.

Ownership and state

classDiagram
    FFTGraph *-- MPSGraph : graph
    FFTGraph o-- MPSGraphTensor : sourceT
    FFTGraph o-- MPSGraphTensor : resT
    FFTGraph o-- MPSGraphTensor : limitT

Ownership evidence

MPSGraphFFTSample/MPSGraphFFTSample.swift:51 — stored dependency or nearest verified ownership anchor

    var graph = MPSGraph()
    var sourceT: MPSGraphTensor? = nil
    var resT: MPSGraphTensor? = nil
    
    var limitT: MPSGraphTensor? = nil
    var limitArray: MPSNDArray? = nil

Composition arrows indicate a source-visible construction expression or locally owned value state; aggregation means the owner stores or receives a dependency without proving exclusive lifetime ownership.

Class and protocol design

MPSGraphFFTSample/MPSGraphFFTSample.swift:280 — representative type boundary

struct MPSGraphFFTSampleApp: App {
    var body: some Scene {
        WindowGroup {
            ContentView()
        }
    }
}

No local protocol conformance is claimed as protocol-oriented design; external framework conformances are listed only as dependencies.

Access control

Reference code

MPSGraphFFTSample/MPSGraphFFTSample.swift:280 — representative boundary

struct MPSGraphFFTSampleApp: App {
    // ...
}

Swift declarations without a modifier are internal; explicit private, fileprivate, private(set), public, or open entries above are interpreted by language semantics. Objective-C/C samples instead rely on header and implementation boundaries, which are not equivalent to Swift lexical privacy.

Logic ownership and placement

Design patterns

Naming conventions

• Types: App: MPSGraphFFTSampleApp; View: ContentView.
• Protocols: no local protocol declaration in the scanned source.
• Methods: loadImage, convertToCGImage, varToUnsafePtr, computePhaseTensor, computeResultTensor, run, updateFFTImage.
• Files: feature/project roles rather than a strict one-type-per-file rule.

Architecture takeaways

• MPSGraphFFTSample is the main source-visible entry or composition anchor for this sample.
• Framework work reaches MetalKit, MetalPerformanceShadersGraph, SwiftUI through a deliberately small high-level chain; the detailed API graph remains inside the cited implementation files.
• Stored-property evidence identifies lifecycle collaboration; it does not by itself prove exclusive object ownership.
• Access-control conclusions separate verified language visibility from the likely design rationale.
• The source does not justify labeling the design protocol-oriented.

Source map

• Official Apple documentation