Binding JSON data to TVML documents
At a glance
| Item | Summary |
|---|---|
| Purpose | Create full-fledged TVML documents by using data binding and queries on simplified TVML files. |
| App architecture | A JavaScript, Swift sample centered on AppDelegate, with direct use of DataBindings, TVMLKit, UIKit. |
| Main patterns | Delegate or data-source callbacks |
| Project style | 4 scanned source file(s) across JavaScript, Swift, organized around ranked entry, type, and file boundaries. |
Project structure
Source bundle/
├── DataBindings/
│ ├── DataBindings/
│ │ ├── application.js
│ │ ├── AppDelegate.swift
│ │ └── Info.plist
│ ├── DataBindingsTests/
│ │ ├── DataBindingsTests.swift
│ │ └── Info.plist
│ ├── DataBindingsUITests/
│ │ ├── DataBindingsUITests.swift
│ │ └── Info.plist
│ └── DataBindings.xcodeproj/
│ ├── .xcodesamplecode.plist
│ └── project.pbxproj
└── Configuration/
└── SampleCode.xcconfig
Structure observations
- Architecturally prominent files are ranked from entry points and role-named declarations; resource-only paths are omitted.
- Primary languages: JavaScript, Swift.
- The verified tree contains 6 project/configuration file(s) and 3 source declaration(s).
Overall architecture
flowchart LR
N1["AppDelegate"]
N2["TVMLKit APIs"]
N1 --> N2
Reference code
DataBindings/DataBindings/AppDelegate.swift:11 — architecture anchor
@UIApplicationMain
class AppDelegate: UIResponder, UIApplicationDelegate, TVApplicationControllerDelegate {
// ...
}Interpretation
The arrows summarize the source-visible entry, role-named types or folders, and framework direction; when nodes come from structural folders, the sequence is a high-level interpretation rather than proof that every adjacent node calls the next. Ownership is claimed only where the next section cites a stored property or assignment. The diagram is intentionally limited to the dominant path into TVMLKit JS.
Ownership and state
classDiagram
application *-- XMLHttpRequest : xhr
application *-- XMLHttpRequest : templateXHR
application *-- DataItem : objectItem
AppDelegate o-- UIWindow : window
Ownership evidence
DataBindings/DataBindings/application.js:11 — stored dependency or nearest verified ownership anchor
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr.onreadystatechange = function () {
if (this.readyState == 4 && this.status == 200) {
getJson(jsonURL, xhr.responseXML);
}
}
xhr.open("GET", url, false);| Owner | Object or state | Relationship | Mutation authority |
|---|---|---|---|
application |
XMLHttpRequest (xhr) |
creates and retains | App/module collaborators |
application |
XMLHttpRequest (templateXHR) |
creates and retains | App/module collaborators |
application |
DataItem (objectItem) |
creates and retains | Initialized by the owner; the binding is immutable |
AppDelegate |
UIWindow (window) |
stores or receives | App/module collaborators |
Composition arrows indicate a source-visible construction expression or locally owned value state; aggregation means the owner stores or receives a dependency without proving exclusive lifetime ownership.
Class and protocol design
DataBindings/DataBindings/AppDelegate.swift:12 — representative type boundary
class AppDelegate: UIResponder, UIApplicationDelegate, TVApplicationControllerDelegate {
// ...
}| Type | Responsibility | Depends on or conforms to |
|---|---|---|
AppDelegate |
Receives callback-driven events | UIResponder, UIApplicationDelegate, TVApplicationControllerDelegate |
DataBindingsTests |
Owns feature behavior and collaborator lifecycle | XCTestCase |
DataBindingsUITests |
Owns feature behavior and collaborator lifecycle | XCTestCase |
No local protocol conformance is claimed as protocol-oriented design; external framework conformances are listed only as dependencies.
Access control
| Symbol | Access | Verified effect | Likely rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
AppDelegate (DataBindings/DataBindings/AppDelegate.swift:12) |
implicit internal |
No explicit modifier means the Swift declaration is internal to the module. | Inference: app-target collaboration needs no exported library surface. |
DataBindingsTests (DataBindings/DataBindingsTests/DataBindingsTests.swift:10) |
implicit internal |
No explicit modifier means the Swift declaration is internal to the module. | Inference: app-target collaboration needs no exported library surface. |
DataBindingsUITests (DataBindings/DataBindingsUITests/DataBindingsUITests.swift:10) |
implicit internal |
No explicit modifier means the Swift declaration is internal to the module. | Inference: app-target collaboration needs no exported library surface. |
Reference code
DataBindings/DataBindings/AppDelegate.swift:12 — representative boundary
class AppDelegate: UIResponder, UIApplicationDelegate, TVApplicationControllerDelegate {
// ...
}Swift declarations without a modifier are internal; explicit private, fileprivate, private(set), public, or open entries above are interpreted by language semantics. Objective-C/C samples instead rely on header and implementation boundaries, which are not equivalent to Swift lexical privacy.
Logic ownership and placement
| Logic | Owning type or file | Placement rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Receives callback-driven events | AppDelegate |
The source’s Delegate suffix makes this role explicit. |
Design patterns
| Pattern | Source evidence | Purpose or tradeoff |
|---|---|---|
| Delegate or data-source callbacks | DataBindings/DataBindings/AppDelegate.swift:12 |
Callback protocols invert event delivery back into the sample’s owner. |
Naming conventions
- Types: Delegate: AppDelegate.
- Protocols: no local protocol declaration in the scanned source.
- Methods:
getTemplate,getJson,insertJson,loadTemplate,pushDoc,executeRemoteMethod,application,applicationWillResignActive. - Files:
DataBindings/DataBindings/AppDelegate.swift,DataBindings/DataBindingsTests/DataBindingsTests.swift,DataBindings/DataBindingsUITests/DataBindingsUITests.swift.
Architecture takeaways
AppDelegateis the main source-visible entry or composition anchor for this sample.- Framework work reaches DataBindings, TVMLKit, UIKit through a deliberately small high-level chain; the detailed API graph remains inside the cited implementation files.
- Stored-property evidence identifies lifecycle collaboration; it does not by itself prove exclusive object ownership.
- Access-control conclusions separate verified language visibility from the likely design rationale.
- The source does not justify labeling the design protocol-oriented.
Source map
| Source file | Relevant symbols |
|---|---|
DataBindings/DataBindings/application.js |
Feature implementation |
DataBindings/DataBindings/AppDelegate.swift |
AppDelegate |
DataBindings/DataBindingsTests/DataBindingsTests.swift |
DataBindingsTests |
DataBindings/DataBindingsUITests/DataBindingsUITests.swift |
DataBindingsUITests |